In order to support what I have said about the use of meaningful occupation and mental health, I am going to analyse and critique an article that supports and relates to the topic.
Goldberg, B., Brintnell, S., & Goldberg, J. (2008). The relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life in persons disabled by mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 18(2), 17-44.
Critique Analyses: From Evidence Based Practice Class, I thought I would bring my skills in ensuring this article is reliable and appropriate. In regards to the authors, they have involvement in either mental health or occupational therapy practice. The title and information within the article relates to the use of meaningful occupation and benefits this has on mental health individuals. The article was published in 2008; therefore it is a current and up to date resource. Within the method, they use test-retest reliability and Cronbach Alpha to analyse results. Use a range of theorist to support opinions and findings.
Aim: The aim of the study was to identify the relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life.
Participants: The participants were individuals with a mental illness living in the community and attending programs at a private, non profit mental health agency in a large western Canadian city. Sixty three individuals were selected at random from approximately 235 who met the criteria for being severely and persistently mentally ill. They were also required to be between the ages of 18 and 65 and diagnosed for at least two years.
Method: All individuals chosen at random were sent a letter describing the project and requesting that they consider participating. The research assistant made a follow up call to these individuals using a standardised script for guidance with answering questions. Those who agreed to participate were scheduled a time at their choice of location either at home or the agency. Participants signed informed consent. Three measures were administered including: the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS); the Quality of Life Interview; and the symptom Checklist-90. The interviews lasted on average 79 minutes. Following a two to 10 week interval, 15 participants repeated the EMAS in order to obtain data on its test-retest reliability.
Results: The results from the data analysis clearly showed that there is a relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life demonstrating a significant correlation of (p < .05).
Conclusion: Occupational therapists working in community mental health should ensure that it is the client who must determine what is meaningful for them, and include activities that increase feelings of control and that provide the right amount of challenge to be encouraged.
ACTIVITY: Go onto the research databases such as google scholar, Cinahl, OT seeker etc and find articles that support the use of meaningful occupation in mental health. This will help with your clinical reasoning in present and future practices and enable you to become an evidence based occupational therapist. Let me know how you get on!